Vronsky, the dashing cavalry officer lover of Anna, is one
of the main protagonists of “Anna Karenina.”
Most readers of the book, however baffled they might be by Anna’s
choices and behavior, feel great deal of sympathy for her. This is not the case for Vronsky. In part because Tolstoy makes him an instrument
of Anna’s destruction but in part
because Tolstoy just makes him unsympathetic in general. Take the case of Vronsky Rules:
VRONSKY’S life
was particularly happy in that he had a code of principles, which defined with
unfailing certitude what he ought and what he ought not to do. This code of
principles covered only a very small circle of contingencies, but then the
principles were never doubtful, and Vronsky, as he never went outside that
circle, had never had a moment’s hesitation about doing what he ought to do.
These principles laid down as invariable rules: that one must pay a
cardsharper, but need not pay a tailor; that one must never tell a lie to a
man, but one may to a woman; that one must never cheat any one, but one may a
husband; that one must never pardon an insult, but one may give one and so on.
There was nothing strange about these rules, except that
Vronsky made them explicit. But
implicitly, many men of Vronsky’s social standing, lived by them. But others did not. Perhaps this could be one of the dividing
lines among Tolstoy’s protagonists .
Thus, Stiva, Anna’s brother, wouldn’t have any problems with the rules
but Levin would. Anatol Kuragin, from
“War and Peace” wouldn’t but Andrei Bolkonsky definitely would.
No comments:
Post a Comment